Compliance

EPR reporting for packaging manufacturers: how to stop it eating your weeks

Packaging EPR reports take weeks when the data lives in five places. Here's where the time goes and how manufacturers are automating it.

EPR reporting automation for packaging manufacturers

By YBO · · 3 min read

If you make or supply packaging in the UK, Extended Producer Responsibility has probably added a new job to someone's calendar. Every reporting period, somebody has to work out how much packaging you placed on the market, what it was made of, and where it went. Then they have to submit it.

On paper that sounds simple. In practice it often turns into weeks of chasing numbers. One packaging manufacturer we work with now saves around six weeks a year on it, and none of that came from working faster. It came from not doing the same lookups by hand every time.

Why EPR reporting takes so long

The rules themselves aren't the hard part. The hard part is that the data you need is scattered.

  • Product specs sit in one system, or in a folder of PDFs and spreadsheets.
  • Sales volumes live in your ERP or accounts software.
  • Packaging weights and materials might be on supplier spec sheets, some of them years old.
  • Who the packaging went to decides who's responsible for it, so you need customer data too.

Each period, someone pulls exports from each place, lines them up in a spreadsheet, fixes the bits that don't match, and builds the submission. Next period they do it all again from scratch. That's where the weeks go.

What changes when it's automated

The aim isn't to remove people from the process. It's to stop them copying numbers between systems so they can spend their time checking the result.

A good setup usually looks like this:

  1. One packaging spec table. Every product has its packaging components listed once, with weight and material. When a spec changes, it changes in one place.
  2. Sales volumes pulled in automatically. Units sold per product per period come straight from your ERP or accounts system. No exports.
  3. Weights calculated for you. Units multiplied by packaging weight, grouped by material and packaging type, the way the submission needs them.
  4. Gaps flagged, not guessed. A product with no spec, or a material that doesn't map cleanly, goes on a short list for a person to fix.
  5. The file built in the right format. Ready to check and submit, with a record of exactly where every number came from.

The last point matters more than people expect. If you're ever asked how you arrived at a figure, you can show your working in minutes instead of rebuilding it.

What stays with your team

Automation handles the gathering and the maths. Your team still owns the decisions: checking anything flagged, confirming classifications that need judgement, and signing off the submission. That split is the reason it works. People only touch the parts that actually need a person.

Deadlines don't move, so the prep shouldn't be a scramble

Larger producers report twice a year and smaller ones once a year, so the deadlines keep coming round. For larger producers, January to June data is due by 1 October. Fees depend on how much packaging you place on the market and what it's made of, and they're starting to reflect how recyclable it is too. That makes accurate material data worth more every year. Check the government's EPR guidance for the thresholds and dates that apply to you, or read our plain-English guide to EPR for packaging for the full picture.

When the data gathers itself through the period, the deadline stops being a project. It becomes a check.

Where to start

You don't need to rebuild everything at once. Most manufacturers start with the packaging spec table, because everything else depends on it. Then connect sales volumes. Then the output file.

If EPR reporting is taking your team weeks, book a free 30-minute call. We'll look at where your data lives today and tell you honestly how much of it can run on its own. You can also read about how we approach automation.

Keep reading